zlacker

>>convex+(OP)
Are those the first cracks in the AI market bubble?

>>dschue+D3
Is it a bubble if it’s useful and I use it dozens of time a day?

>>huyter+X3
It can be useful in certain contexts, most certainly as a code co-pilot, but that and yours/others' usage doesn't change the fundamental mismatch between the limits of this tech and what Sam and others have hyped it up to do.

We've already trained it on all the data there is, it's not going to get "smarter" and it'll always lack true subjective understanding, so the overhype has been real, indeed to bubble levels as per OP.

>>mi3law+m4
> it's not going to get "smarter" and it'll always lack true subjective understanding

What is your basis for those claims? Especially the first one; I would think it's obvious that it will get smarter; the only questions are how much and how quickly. As far as subjective understanding, we're getting into the nature of consciousness territory, but if it can perform the same tasks, it doesn't really impact the value.