zlacker

[return to "Greg Brockman quits OpenAI"]
1. robswc+fb[view] [source] 2023-11-18 01:03:38
>>nickru+(OP)
Can a super smart business-y person educate this engineer on how this even happens.

So, if there's 6 board members and they're looking to "take down" 2... that means those 2 can't really participate, right? Or at the very least, they have to "recuse" themselves on votes regarding them?

Do the 4 members have to organize and communicate "in secret"? Is there any reason 3 members can't hold a vote to oust 1, making it a 3/5 to reach majority, and then from there, just start voting _everyone_ out? Probably stupid questions but I'm curious enough to ask, lol.

◧◩
2. 0xDEF+xc[view] [source] 2023-11-18 01:10:03
>>robswc+fb
>Can a super smart business-y person educate this engineer on how this even happens.

There is nothing business-y about this. As a non-profit OpenAI can do whatever they want.

◧◩◪
3. robswc+cd[view] [source] 2023-11-18 01:14:03
>>0xDEF+xc
Well, there has to be some sort of framework in which they operate, no?

OpenAI isn't a single person, so decisions like firing the CEO have to be made somehow. I'm wondering about how that framework actually works.

◧◩◪◨
4. adastr+BW[view] [source] 2023-11-18 06:58:08
>>robswc+cd
There isn't really any rules specified in the law for this, unlike with corporate law which mandates companies to be structured a certain way. We'd have to see OpenAI's operating by-laws.
[go to top]