zlacker

>>apsec1+(OP)
Can anything actually back this up please? This twitter account is just posting stuff and then crediting "Sources".

>>LoganD+m1
"This twitter account" is Kara Swisher, probably the most well-known tech reporter working right now. She has known essentially everyone in the tech world for decades at this point. Her sources are not only going to be legit, but she probably has more of them than literally anyone else in the tech world, so she can accurately corroborate information or not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kara_Swisher

>>crazyg+B1
That does not change the fact there are no sources. Knowing people does not mean you are never wrong, nor does it mean you will never twist a story.

>>charci+X2
Clearly there are sources. They are anonymous sources. Important news is delivered by anonymous sources every day.

Now, sure, you can't just trust anyone who tells you they heard something anonymously. That's where the the whole idea of journalists with names working for organizations with records of credibility comes from. We trust (or should) trust Swisher because she gets this stuff right, every day. Is she "never" wrong? Of course not. But this is quality news nonetheless.