zlacker

[return to "OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman"]
1. baidif+aq[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:16:39
>>davidb+(OP)
- Cant be a personal scandal, press release would be worded much more differently

- Board is mostly independent and those independent dont have equity

- They talk about not being candid - this is legalese for “lying”

The only major thing that could warrant something like this is Sam going behind the boards back to make a decision (or make progress on a decision) that is misaligned with the Charter. Thats the only fireable offense that warrants this language.

My bet: Sam initiated some commercial agreement (like a sale) to an entity that would have violated the “open” nature of the company. Likely he pursued a sale to Microsoft without the board knowing.

◧◩
2. podnam+js[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:27:17
>>baidif+aq
Doesn’t make any sense. He is ideologically driven - why would he risk a once in a lifetime opportunity for a mere sale?

Desperate times calls for desperate measures. This is a swift way for OpenAI to shield the business from something which is a PR disaster, probably something which would make Sam persona non grata in any business context.

◧◩◪
3. dogcom+ct[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:30:59
>>podnam+js
He claims to be ideologically driven. OpenAI's actions as a company up til now point otherwise
◧◩◪◨
4. dmix+0v[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:38:32
>>dogcom+ct
Sam didn't take equity in OpenAi so I don't see a personal ulterior profit motive as being a big likelihood. We could just wait to find out instead of speculating...
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dustin+kF[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:28:06
>>dmix+0v
openai (the brand) has complex corporate structure with split for profit non profit entities and afaik the details are private. It would appear that the statement “Sam didn’t take equity in OAI” has been PR engineered based on technicalities related to this shadow structure.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. jppope+WV[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:46:10
>>dustin+kF
I would suspect this as well...
[go to top]