zlacker

[return to "OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman"]
1. nikcub+Gj[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:40:38
>>davidb+(OP)
Put the pieces together:

Nov 6 - OpenAI devday, with new features of build-your-own ChatGPT and more

Nov 9 - Microsoft cuts employees off from ChatGPT due to "security concerns" [0]

Nov 9 - OpenAI experiences severe downtime the company attributes to a "DDoS" (not the correct term for 'excess usage') [3]

Nov 15 - OpenAI announce no new ChatGPT plus upgrades [1] but still allow regular signups (and still do)

Nov 17 - OpenAI fire Altman

Put the threads together - one theory: the new release had a serious security issue, leaked a bunch of data, and it wasn't disclosed, but Microsoft knew about it.

This wouldn't be the first time - in March there was an incident where users were seeing the private chats of other users [2]

Further extending theory - prioritizing getting to market overrode security/privacy testing, and this most recent release caused something much, much larger.

Further: CTO Mira / others internally concerned about launch etc. but overruled by CEO. Kicks issue up to board, hence their trust in her taking over as interim CEO.

edit: added note on DDoS (thanks kristjansson below) - and despite the downtime it was only upgrades to ChatGPT Plus with the new features that were disabled. Note on why CTO would take over.

[0] https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/09/microsoft-restricts-employee...

[1] https://twitter.com/sama/status/1724626002595471740

[2] https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/21/23649806/chatgpt-chat-his...

[3] https://techcrunch.com/2023/11/09/openai-blames-ddos-attack-...

◧◩
2. thanhh+uo[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:06:10
>>nikcub+Gj
My bet is actually not on the recent security concern, but more about OpenAI "was not consistenly candid" on how it trained data. Facing the recent lawsuits, that would explain the hasty firing. The security concern is huge, but doesn't warrant an immediate firing.
◧◩◪
3. Paul-C+qG[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:33:24
>>thanhh+uo
Pending lawsuits aren't a thing that warrants taking action before the market closes.
◧◩◪◨
4. kaliqt+eN[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:07:26
>>Paul-C+qG
Imagine Satya wasn't informed about this. The heart attack he must have gotten seeing the stock prices.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. sumedh+LS[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:30:47
>>kaliqt+eN
> The heart attack he must have gotten seeing the stock prices.

Why would a 2% drop bother him?

[go to top]