zlacker

[return to "OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman"]
1. baidif+aq[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:16:39
>>davidb+(OP)
- Cant be a personal scandal, press release would be worded much more differently

- Board is mostly independent and those independent dont have equity

- They talk about not being candid - this is legalese for “lying”

The only major thing that could warrant something like this is Sam going behind the boards back to make a decision (or make progress on a decision) that is misaligned with the Charter. Thats the only fireable offense that warrants this language.

My bet: Sam initiated some commercial agreement (like a sale) to an entity that would have violated the “open” nature of the company. Likely he pursued a sale to Microsoft without the board knowing.

◧◩
2. podnam+js[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:27:17
>>baidif+aq
Doesn’t make any sense. He is ideologically driven - why would he risk a once in a lifetime opportunity for a mere sale?

Desperate times calls for desperate measures. This is a swift way for OpenAI to shield the business from something which is a PR disaster, probably something which would make Sam persona non grata in any business context.

◧◩◪
3. smcleo+8D[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:18:11
>>podnam+js
I highly doubt he's ideologically driven. He's as much of a VC loving silicon valley tech-bro as the next. The company has been anything but "open".
◧◩◪◨
4. freedo+HE[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:25:18
>>smcleo+8D
He doesn't have equity, so what would be driving him if not ideology?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. enonim+1I[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:40:17
>>freedo+HE
He would own roughly 10% of https://worldcoin.org/ which aims to be the non-corruptible source of digital identity in the age of AI.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. dkarra+yP[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:17:28
>>enonim+1I
another crypto scam? who cares.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. enonim+KS[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:30:45
>>dkarra+yP
In all other circumstances I would agree with you but

1. Sam Altman started this company

2. He and other founders would benefit enormously if this was the way to solve the issue that AI raises, namely, "are you a human?"

3. Their mission statement:

> The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has accelerated the need to differentiate between human- and AI-generated content online Proof of personhood addresses two of the key considerations presented by the Age of AI: (1) protecting against sybil attacks and (2) minimizing the spread of AI-generated misinformation World ID, an open and permissionless identity protocol, acts as a global digital passport and can be used anonymously to prove uniqueness and humanness as well as to selectively disclose credentials issued by other parties Worldcoin has published in-depth resources to provide more details about proof of personhood and World ID

[go to top]