zlacker

[return to "OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman"]
◧
1. fabian+Z8[view] [source] 2023-11-17 20:55:54
>>davidb+(OP)
I would translate "not consistently candid with the board" as "he lied to the board about something important enough to fire him on the spot". This seems like the kind of statement lawyers would advise you to not make publicly unless you have proof, and it seems unusual compared to most statements of that kind that are intentionally devoid of any information or blame.
◧◩
2. ryandv+jb[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:05:34
>>fabian+Z8
Kinda nervous wondering what Altman wasn't sharing with them. I hope it's not that they already have a fully sentient AGI locked up in a server room somewhere...
◧◩◪
3. siva7+5d[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:13:13
>>ryandv+jb
I wouldn't be shocked if this turns out to be the case. Any other explanation wouldn't add up for this guy
◧◩◪◨
4. justsi+Mh[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:33:03
>>siva7+5d
There is no way he'd be fired if they had AGI. If they had AGI, the board wouldn't fire him because they could no longer see anything other than massive dollar signs.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. petter+Xk[view] [source] 2023-11-17 21:45:57
>>justsi+Mh
The board is the board of a non profit, isn't it?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. 9dev+RP[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:18:44
>>petter+Xk
Hah, that’s cute. As if that ever kept anyone from making money.
[go to top]