zlacker

[return to "Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive"]
1. V__+r8[view] [source] 2023-11-16 16:53:45
>>mikece+(OP)
Signal had 40 million active users in 2021 [1]. With 14 million in infra cost, that comes to .35 per user/year. Total expenses are about 33 million, so about .825 per user/year. All in all that seems very reasonable.

[1] https://www.businessofapps.com/data/signal-statistics/

◧◩
2. renewi+Nh[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:27:47
>>V__+r8
I wonder how many people paid the $5 for WhatsApp back in the day. It gave you nothing but you were able to do it. I think I did.
◧◩◪
3. abdull+tk[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:38:27
>>renewi+Nh
Whatsapp was asking for $1/year [1]

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jan/18/whatsapp-...

◧◩◪◨
4. lxgr+pp[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:59:21
>>abdull+tk
I've been using WhatsApp when the nominal $1/year fee was still around, but somehow never ended up being actually charged, and I don't know anyone that did.

It's possible that they were only enforcing it in some regions, though.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. abdull+4t[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:14:41
>>lxgr+pp
Indeed. I just ignored the dialog box the first time it popped up. But next year I paid. It was quite a big deal because back then it was equal to my entire monthly cellphone bill in Pakistan.

But I remember other people started to en masse switch to other messengers like Viber(?). And Whatsapp had to stop enforcing the fee.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. fwn+qC2[view] [source] 2023-11-17 09:54:13
>>abdull+4t
I was billed 0,99€ (Germany) exactly once, but was able to use WhatsApp without payment for most of the time just by ignoring the notification. I remember that they repeatedly gave grace periods and just set another payment date a few weeks later.
[go to top]