zlacker

[return to "Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive"]
1. ruffre+fb[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:05:28
>>mikece+(OP)
I would pay for a few signal features: 1. encrypted backups or backup integration of my chats, photos and videos. 2. business features (backup, directory integration, search)

I have not used: 1. voice and video

Incredible that SMS costs so much. I wonder if it's worth it because it _saves_ so much in spam and other sorts of fraud or bad behavior?

◧◩
2. Aachen+sy[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:42:43
>>ruffre+fb
I have some good news: go into the settings and turn on encrypted backups. The clients also all come with a search function, even if it only matches against start-of-word (which includes URLs, so you can't search for domain names which regularly bothers me).

Directory integration, as in, importing a vcard with everyone's phone number into your device such that you can tap on anyone's name and message them on Signal if they've got Signal installed?

◧◩◪
3. crtasm+PK[view] [source] 2023-11-16 19:38:08
>>Aachen+sy
The backup option is Android-only.
◧◩◪◨
4. Aachen+7V[view] [source] 2023-11-16 20:25:05
>>crtasm+PK
O.o TIL. That's weird, apple users already have plenty of lock-in and own-data-inaccessibility, but so maybe they figured they clearly don't care? Weird as heck either way

Then what I can recommend is installing the desktop client on a server somewhere and reading its sqlite-like (but with some flaky encryption extension) messages database

[go to top]