zlacker

[return to "Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive"]
1. V__+r8[view] [source] 2023-11-16 16:53:45
>>mikece+(OP)
Signal had 40 million active users in 2021 [1]. With 14 million in infra cost, that comes to .35 per user/year. Total expenses are about 33 million, so about .825 per user/year. All in all that seems very reasonable.

[1] https://www.businessofapps.com/data/signal-statistics/

◧◩
2. rogerk+Q8[view] [source] 2023-11-16 16:55:16
>>V__+r8
Based on App Store downloads on both platforms, they are well over 200M at this point.
◧◩◪
3. nvy+Rg[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:24:48
>>rogerk+Q8
A lot of people, myself included, have it installed but never use it after they dropped SMS support.

Only a tiny fraction of my contacts use Signal, and most of those are also on Whatsapp, Telegram, Discord, and others.

Signal offers essentially nothing to me.

◧◩◪◨
4. rasso+js[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:11:25
>>nvy+Rg
Except real privacy?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. umanwi+9z[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:46:20
>>rasso+js
Why is it more private than WhatsApp?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Ar-Cur+KA[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:53:35
>>umanwi+9z
I encourage you to read the article, but Signal minimizes the metadata it stores about you, doesn't hold on to you contact list, doesn't keep information about your IP address, etc.

WhatsApp instead makes tons of money from this kind of metadata.

[go to top]