zlacker

[return to "Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive"]
1. Muffin+u7[view] [source] 2023-11-16 16:49:44
>>mikece+(OP)
If you really wanted to talk to somebody in a "non-decryptable" fashion, could you set up like a channel that encrypts itself with a ton of different encryption methods, keys, etc. (encrypted payloads inside each other)

Signal encryption is its main feature (I think) and how easy it makes it (abstracts handling key transfer and all that), I'm just trying to think through... if I wanted nobody to read what I was saying , would I use an app/target as popular as Signal or something homegrown?

◧◩
2. sterli+Yc[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:11:52
>>Muffin+u7
lots of drug traffickers went with something homegrown (Anom), which turned out to be an FBI front. they'd have been a lot safer sticking to Signal. and you can audit the Signal client's source code, which is enough to verify its secrecy.
[go to top]