zlacker

[return to "Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive"]
1. Muffin+u7[view] [source] 2023-11-16 16:49:44
>>mikece+(OP)
If you really wanted to talk to somebody in a "non-decryptable" fashion, could you set up like a channel that encrypts itself with a ton of different encryption methods, keys, etc. (encrypted payloads inside each other)

Signal encryption is its main feature (I think) and how easy it makes it (abstracts handling key transfer and all that), I'm just trying to think through... if I wanted nobody to read what I was saying , would I use an app/target as popular as Signal or something homegrown?

◧◩
2. Button+4a[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:00:53
>>Muffin+u7
It's a bit off topic, but I've wondered the same.

We could stack a hundred layers of encryption algorithms, and if just one of them works, then the whole stack is secure.

[go to top]