zlacker

[return to "AI companies have all kinds of arguments against paying for copyrighted content"]
1. mg+Me[view] [source] 2023-11-05 18:14:53
>>rntn+(OP)
In wonder if copyrighted content will be needed at all in the future of AI training.

AlphaZero learned to play chess via self-play, not by reading books about chess.

Why couldn't the same happen for art for example?

For coding, won't a sufficiently advanced neural net be able to figure out how to use a programming language when given just the documentation?

And when most of our interactions are with AI, it will learn from our conversations with it. Asking some AI system why feature X was removed from programming language Y in version Z teaches it something. The next person who asks it which feature was removed from Y in version Z might be told "X". Without the AI system ever having to read about it. The interaction with AI could become a self-learning loop in and on itself.

◧◩
2. fwip+7n[view] [source] 2023-11-05 18:57:34
>>mg+Me
> Why couldn't the same happen for art for example?

For starters, because "art" does not have an objective scoring function.

[go to top]