zlacker

>>rntn+(OP)
The argument of the training inputs are "just like reading a book" seems like a fair statement IMO albeit antiquated these days. However, generating text, audio, or images in the specific style of an individual creator seems like a slippery slope that ultimately deserves some kind of renumeration.

I'm glad I'm not a lawyer or politician trying to sort this out. If AI gets commercially crippled, I really don't want to live in a world of black market training data.

>>simple+sl
> However, generating text, audio, or images in the specific style of an individual creator seems like a slippery slope that ultimately deserves some kind of renumeration.

It's hard to find a foothold. Human output doesn't have this restriction. Further, it feels like regulating solar power so coal miners can keep their jobs.

Just banning it or regulating output may seem like a solution to some, but all that means is that we'll cripple ourselves so other, more technologically progressive economies can sprint past us in affected markets. Neither saving the jobs in the end, and ultimately hurting more people than the markets we tried to save.

But we do desperately need to sort out how this is going to devastate entire markets of labor before it risks major economic upheaval with no safety nets in place.