zlacker

>>rntn+(OP)
The argument of the training inputs are "just like reading a book" seems like a fair statement IMO albeit antiquated these days. However, generating text, audio, or images in the specific style of an individual creator seems like a slippery slope that ultimately deserves some kind of renumeration.

I'm glad I'm not a lawyer or politician trying to sort this out. If AI gets commercially crippled, I really don't want to live in a world of black market training data.

>>simple+sl
Making "style" into private property subject to infringement seems like the far more slippery slope to me. I think existing copyright laws are more than sufficient, for cases where there are actually generations with substantial similarity to some protected work.