zlacker

>>cebert+(OP)
Can a lawyer say whether those terms would claim to preclude training an LLM on the site?

And will that stand up?

>>neilv+l2
Ah, that's the new "clean room" approach? Just train an LLM and anything it outputs is wholly unencumbered by any intellectual property laws. That does seem to be roughly what the big players are claiming.

>>tyingq+dd
Funny how "cleanroom" and "laundering" have very different connotations.