zlacker

>>flavor+(OP)
There's definitely value in providing this functionality for photographs taken in the present.

But I think the real value -- and this is definitely in Google's favor -- is providing this functionality for photos you have taken in the past.

I have probably 30K+ photos in Google Photos that capture moments from the past 15 years. There are quite a lot of them where I've taken multiple shots of the same scene in quick succession, and it would be fairly straightforward for Google to detect such groupings and apply the technique to produce synthesized pictures that are better than the originals. It already does something similar for photo collages and "best in a series of rapid shots." They surface without my having to do anything.

>>jawns+ao
Every picture is a picture from the past though

>>thesua+RB
Every state machine is bound to cycle at some point, even if it has the size of the universe.

>>ameliu+9U2
This is not true, its very trivial to design a state machine that won't cycle.

>>flanke+nV2
Sorry, forgot to add that it should be reversible, like the laws of physics.

>>ameliu+KY2
Also, not all laws of physics are time reversible, i.e. the second law of thermodynamics.