zlacker

>>geox+(OP)
What I’m most interested in is better understanding how they’re discretizing the presence or absence of autism. I can’t tell if the research tries to distinguish “magnitudes” of autism or if it’s just a binary result.

>>Waterl+F4
How does that matter? If you're diagnosed autism, then, guess what, you have autism. It's not binary, but why does it matter? If it goes from 0.04 autism to 0.79 autism. Nothing in life is black and white. The importance of this research was to find if a correlation exists. They confirmed that it does.

>>Myster+f5
What does 0.001 autism mean