The control side was 54 males without autism and 67 females without autism.
Maybe 34 is enough to get that statistical conclusion, but it seems pretty small. It's based on recall of if they had -frequent diet drinks- (edit: cutoff variable was one single diet drink per day) during pregnancy, so it might be being determined by like 15 people for the female side that were diet drink users and more for the controls, further divided by 6 different demographic subsets? Will try and find that number.
Since then I think they discovered they were under-diagnosing it in females due to gender norms, but my impression is that it still skews more heavily towards males (3:1 or 4:1).