zlacker

[return to "A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy"]
1. firest+MP5[view] [source] 2023-09-27 10:46:21
>>rossan+(OP)
“ Let there be no misunderstanding on the point that shaking is an absolutely real and dramatic form of child abuse. Inflicted head trauma is a devastating condition and a definite cause of traumatic brain injuries, including intracranial hemorrhage. Many medical determinations of SBS/AHT are made on children who have effectively been victims of violent intentional trauma. Prevention efforts against all forms of child abuse are totally warranted.”

A lot of the comments here are missing this key statement. While there can be medical explanations for things that look like SBS, it’s exceedingly rare

◧◩
2. emoden+qe9[view] [source] 2023-09-28 06:10:13
>>firest+MP5
> A lot of the comments here are missing this key statement. While there can be medical explanations for things that look like SBS, it’s exceedingly rare

The article seems to be dedicated to precisely the opposite conclusion. The author's contention would seem to be that in cases of shaking there is other trauma that doesn't fit the "shaken baby syndrome" theory.

[go to top]