zlacker

[return to "A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy"]
1. Fire-D+Fu5[view] [source] 2023-09-27 07:56:52
>>rossan+(OP)
When I was getting ready to turn dad for the first time, I read a few books on pregnancy, children and parenting. My trust on medicine dropped substantially when I discovered that doctors have poor notion of statistics, so they take for granted improper studies results.

I remember one classic one is the "no coffee when pregnant", the study says this causes problems, the test was performed on rats and by feeding them coffee in the amount of 3/4 of their body weight. We can agree that with this amount, it's reasonable it could cause problems. Very different from one cup of coffee though.

The other study that was done is about Amniocentesis, this one is more interesting the chance of miscarriage is considered 0.1% but this was before the operation was performed with a live ultrasound to look at the needle while performing it, which (probably) makes a big difference. Before, doctors performed an ultrasound and then went in blind.

There was also a serious bias towards a certain type of population. But of course doctors don't bring this up at all.

Last thing is sids, it's a terrible type of diagnosis that pushes parents against the instinct of sleeping with their children, even though this is commonly done in non-western cultures and can save a lot of pain to the parents and give a lot of security to the child. Do your research though, medical community reports risks and I'm no doctor, just a dad who read a few books.

Glad my children are healthy. Every time I read about some illness for children I feel an incredible weight on my heart

◧◩
2. cjrp+4C5[view] [source] 2023-09-27 08:56:14
>>Fire-D+Fu5
Has SIDS been linked to co-sleeping? I thought the risks of co-sleeping were more around accidentally rolling on or suffocating the baby.
◧◩◪
3. lesam+h16[view] [source] 2023-09-27 12:15:46
>>cjrp+4C5
Newer research shows a good chunk of SIDS cases actually _are_ likely suffocation from various causes.

That’s why the SIDS reduction measures are mostly ‘sleep on the back, in an empty crib, with nothing soft around’.

But it’s much easier to tell a grieving parent that there’s nothing they could have done, than that their baby got unlucky and suffocated to death.

◧◩◪◨
4. droopy+ht6[view] [source] 2023-09-27 14:36:45
>>lesam+h16
You are speaking facts, but it runs into the medical problem of “overdiagnosis” where the treatment can be worse than the disease.

Swaddling the baby and forcing it to sleep on its back, may have a tiny statistical benefit for SIDS, but it causes tons of problems at a time when people are taxed to the limit of their abilities.

We could reduce the incident of breast cancer by removing every woman’s breasts, but that would be an improper risk assessment.

The biggest factor linked to SIDS is poverty, and after that it’s stuff like going to bed while under the influence of drugs and smoking.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. omnibr+ha8[view] [source] 2023-09-27 21:45:52
>>droopy+ht6
And as soon as your baby can turn itself you have no more influence in which position it sleeps anyway.
[go to top]