zlacker

[return to "A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy"]
1. firest+MP5[view] [source] 2023-09-27 10:46:21
>>rossan+(OP)
“ Let there be no misunderstanding on the point that shaking is an absolutely real and dramatic form of child abuse. Inflicted head trauma is a devastating condition and a definite cause of traumatic brain injuries, including intracranial hemorrhage. Many medical determinations of SBS/AHT are made on children who have effectively been victims of violent intentional trauma. Prevention efforts against all forms of child abuse are totally warranted.”

A lot of the comments here are missing this key statement. While there can be medical explanations for things that look like SBS, it’s exceedingly rare

◧◩
2. Clarit+6i6[view] [source] 2023-09-27 13:45:57
>>firest+MP5
You're assuming that medical science is capable of providing an explanation in every case, when the whole point of this article is to say that these symptoms are insufficient to diagnose SBS. The author is saying if we have no alternative medical explanations, then we have no medical explanation at all. In order to diagnose SBS, the author suggests that you need additional evidence suggesting trauma such as bruising, broken bones, etc. Indeed, that seems to be what the SBS lobby is now saying as well, they just haven't communicated that to front-line providers.
◧◩◪
3. firest+Zr6[view] [source] 2023-09-27 14:31:31
>>Clarit+6i6
"You're assuming that medical science is capable of providing an explanation in every case, when the whole point of this article is to say that these symptoms are insufficient to diagnose SBS"

I do not disagree with you. I just caution as does the author that you can't rule out criminality either.

[go to top]