zlacker

>>c420+(OP)
Sounds like the idea is that the fake profiles are created so they can make mass "friend requests". Then, when those friend requests are accepted by some amount of your actual friends, it unlocks more access to your data. Or even more if you're fooled and accept one of the fake profiles as a friend/follower.

I guess NYPD's way around people that don't make their profiles fully public.

It would be interesting if Facebook is willing to punish/ban/etc not just the companies directly doing this, but their clients as well.

>>tyingq+W4
This is an old strategy, and one of the reasons I don't accept random friend requests.

It isn't just the NYPD that does this, it's advertisers, data mining companies, financial institutions, employers, nation-states, ex's, stalkers, etc.

It's cheap and easy to do, so why wouldn't organizations mine that data that have the resources to do so?

>>heavys+V6
If your strategy is to give private data to an ad company and then expect who you do or do not friend to be the perimeter that controls its distribution, you have already lost.

The best thing you can do is to delete your profiles on these services.

>>sneak+68
Such services are useful (to me, for one), you're throwing out the baby with the bath water.

>>pbhjpb+ef
The problem is that when you are on it, you contribute to the network effect and make it more useful to others to submit themselves to surveillance in turn. You and your interactions with your friends becomes the honey in the trap.

I urge a visit to the Stasi museum in Berlin.