zlacker

[return to "The Decomposition of Rotten Tomatoes"]
1. ernest+d93[view] [source] 2023-09-07 19:52:08
>>tortil+(OP)
Rotten tomatoes is actually very useful if you know the magic formula:

* If tomatometer & audience score are within 5% of each other, you can trust the ratings to give you a decent indiciation of movie quality.

* If tomatometer is more than 15%+ higher than audience score, it means it's an artsy fartsy movie that critics like and movies don't.

* If audience score is 15%+ higher than tomatometer, it's a fun movie even if it's not oscar worthy. (https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/old_school is a perfect example)

◧◩
2. broken+pl3[view] [source] 2023-09-07 20:53:33
>>ernest+d93
Low audience vs critic reviews can also indicate review bombing. This often happens on films or TV shows targeted by rightwing media for being too “woke”.

The show that always sticks in my mind as an example is HBO’s Watchmen, which has 96% with critics and 56% with the audience.

◧◩◪
3. takeda+5I4[view] [source] 2023-09-08 07:38:26
>>broken+pl3
It works the other way look up Sound of Freedom 60% critics, 99% (not long ago it was 100%) audience. You can't make it any more obvious.
◧◩◪◨
4. broken+ef5[view] [source] 2023-09-08 12:38:08
>>takeda+5I4
Yup, Sound of Freedom was pushed very heavily by rightwing media.

There were daily articles on news sites like Breitbart about how it was the best movie of the year and how biased critics were trying to destroy it. About how readers should watch it to help support a conservative alternative to Hollywood.

[go to top]