zlacker

[return to "The Decomposition of Rotten Tomatoes"]
1. caract+qS1[view] [source] 2023-09-07 14:53:42
>>tortil+(OP)
captainrenaultshocked.gif
◧◩
2. inanut+bV1[view] [source] 2023-09-07 15:03:08
>>caract+qS1
"I expected this, and it can't be helped." messaging implies to readers that those who would try to stop it are the ostracized out-group.

Among all the possible reactions to news of corruption (of any sort) I've come to the opinion that humorous-resignation normalizes corruption and is, therefore, just as corrupt.

In fact, if I were a bad guy, I'd hire people to leave comments of "The system is broken", "This is normal", "Everyone does it", "There's no way to stop it", and rebuff anyone that proposes solutions. "[Your solution] won't be enough because..."

◧◩◪
3. matheu+e92[view] [source] 2023-09-07 15:52:39
>>inanut+bV1
> just as corrupt

I generally agree with you but not on that point. I don't blame people for checking out. Fighting the wrongness of the world is just extremely tiresome. At some point, people change themselves instead. They stop trying to fruitlessly change things and move on with their lives, often with the goal to make a ton of money so they can isolate themselves from the rotten society.

Sometimes the only healthy way to react to something is to laugh at the absurdity of it as if you were a sociopathic Joker. It's a coping mechanism for dealing with an imperfect unfixable reality.

◧◩◪◨
4. inanut+qg3[view] [source] 2023-09-07 20:29:29
>>matheu+e92
Putting effort* into normalizing disenfranchisement is propaganda for the bad guys.

That's my personal revelation.

But to your point, perhaps "just as corrupt" should have been "are, surprisingly, complicit in that corruption".

* "Effort" in this case being "going to the effort of posting". Be checked out? Sure. Being checked out is not my argument. Instead, being engaged-but-jaded and thus broadcasting "corruption is normal" (and thus penalizing corruption is "weird") is /itself/ corrupting.

[go to top]