zlacker

[return to "The Decomposition of Rotten Tomatoes"]
1. legits+D53[view] [source] 2023-09-07 19:36:16
>>tortil+(OP)
Honestly, all review aggregates are kind of trash. It's crazy that we have stuck with either binary or 5 star ratings this whole time across the internet.

I had a product idea I have yet to make where you replace ratings with rankings. Instead of giving something a 1-5 review, you just answer a few quick questions whether something is better or worse than a listed alternative. You aggregate enough rankings and you can give everything a percentile score. The number is actually meaningful - a 70% means people on average think that it's 70% better than all ranked alternatives.

And you can't lie or influence a ranking as easily. "You think Rings of Power is a good show? Okay, but are you are actually going to rank it above The Sopranos?"

◧◩
2. ramesh+V83[view] [source] 2023-09-07 19:50:31
>>legits+D53
This is why I love Ranker so much. Puts any kind of review aggregation to shame, especially with movies and video games.
◧◩◪
3. gffrd+qc3[view] [source] 2023-09-07 20:07:00
>>ramesh+V83
hahaha: https://www.ranker.com/list/actors-that-love-history-but-not...

The _Actors Who Love History But Not Accuracy_ list. Mel Gibson holding #1, but look out: Costner is on the rise!

[go to top]