- misinterprets statements like "we have X years to do Y or we will have set something in motion that later causes Z" as if that means "Z will happen on January 1st CurrentYear+X";
- misinterprets the words "may" and "could", which typically indicate an extreme but possible scenario, since that's what the media wants to quote, not what they actually expect to happen;
- does not take into account when a behavioral change lead to it not coming true (see ozone layer); and
- exclusively shows unlikely claims, at least since the greenhouse gas emission problem became known in the ~90s, rather than looking at a legit prediction from any scientific paper in the last decades for example.
Page footer:
> A project of the #LearnToCode Initiative.
I suppose that settles the debate of whether we should teach everyone to code. Or maybe we didn't teach them enough, as CurrentYear+X != Z is too hard to understand still