zlacker

>>isodev+(OP)
It seems to me that every ‘AI’ effort I see today utterly depends on circumventing or ignoring privacy.

>>jamesg+Cv
I like the part where the reason the US keeps allowing it is that "if we don't, China will", as if China has access to the same flood of data that US FAANG companies and contenders like Zoom have access to every second of every day.

Sure, at the government level it has access to the same data as everyone else, but that firewall's still there, can't have an AI trained on data that might give a more worldly view on matters the party doesn't want citizens exposed to. A Chinese AI will be pretty useless for western audiences, so best they can do is make the hardware.

Which they already do.

>>TheRea+Zy
Even china isnt silly enough to record people’s conversations to “train” ais. Corporate dictatorships have truly overtaken communist dictatorships.

>>gumbal+nH
....what? Which century are you living in that China does record people's conversations?