zlacker

[return to "The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News (2019)"]
1. belfal+Nh[view] [source] 2023-07-28 20:42:25
>>capabl+(OP)
> Still, as an occasional reader, I have noticed certain trends. When stories that focus on structural barriers faced by women in the workplace, or on diversity in tech, or on race or masculinity—stories, admittedly, that are more intriguing to me, a person interested in the humanities, than stories on technical topics—hit the front page, users often flag them, presumably for being off topic, so fast that hardly any comments accrue.

I have noticed this trend for a long time also, and well before this article was first written. It seems to go in waves though I'll cautiously say that it seems to have gotten somewhat better in recent years. I remember a time in the mid-2010s when these kinds of stories would disappear almost instantaneously. Now some of these articles and topics get a good number of upvotes and occasionally even substantive dialogue.

That said, the comments sections on these articles do tend to devolve pretty quickly.

◧◩
2. nitwit+Nj[view] [source] 2023-07-28 20:52:28
>>belfal+Nh
A lot of articles do match the very first thing in the guideline's list of what's off topic:

> Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off-topic.

Specifically, there is this tendency to briefly discuss some new social issue, but then filling the rest of the article with discussion of the current political situation.

◧◩◪
3. johnny+rB1[view] [source] 2023-07-29 08:19:03
>>nitwit+Nj
The devil is in the details, though:

>unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon.

And that's where we will never truly agree until the topic runs super sour. Which can take months.

> there is this tendency to briefly discuss some new social issue, but then filling the rest of the article with discussion of the current political situation.

it makes sense for multiple reasons, no? You never want to assume the general audience is caught up on every little piece of an evolving story, be it a simple celebrity drama or some complex political issue. It's news, not a research paper.

[go to top]