As always people see the happy path down the middle of the forest, not the creatures waiting to leap out and eat them two steps down the line.
Once upon a time, I was a homeless teenager running from a cult. If not for software I wouldn't have gotten out of that.
WEI (and other such things) are mainly about regulating who is allowed to write software, and so the way I think about it is this: If WEI existed when I was a homeless teenager, I might be dead.
I do not think I would like your girlfriend very much if she said keeping "her" stuff working was more important than my life, although I could understand her not understanding how big of a deal it is when you talk abstractly about the "open nature of the web" without putting it into human terms;
The "open" part is really important to get across because it means anyone who has the ability to can contribute: Does such a high level academic with a strong mathematical and logical background understand what can be lost not just to industry, but to science itself when a church wants to name itself the arbiter of who can work?
It takes many years of activism to build awareness for these sorts of issues. I worry that increasingly tight technological control over various aspects of our lives will create more of these situations and eventually overwhelm our capacity to build awareness. The result could be widespread cruelty.
The solution cannot be for each and everyone of us to be aware of and emotionally enganged with every possible predicament in which others could find themselves. It's just not possible psychologically.
We need to design our rules and systems to be resilient in the face of unexpected things going wrong and in the face of permanent partial brokenness of everything, including rule making itself. It's very difficult and I'm not optimistic.