zlacker

>>neelc+(OP)
The problem here is that most people don't give a crap. I was explaining this situation to my girlfriend last night over a drink. She's a high level academic with a strong mathematical and logical background in a different field but she didn't really formulate an opinion on it past "if my stuff keeps working, why is it a problem?". Which is fair, because it's a hypothetical risk, but the side effects are a net negative and the open nature of the web is at risk.

As always people see the happy path down the middle of the forest, not the creatures waiting to leap out and eat them two steps down the line.

>>baz00+8t
Sounds like a variant of the "nothing to hide" argument which, IMO, isn't particularly logical.

>>Knobbl+iv
It's closer to explaining Coca-Cola anti-union murders in Colombia or the use of child labor and forced labor in P&G palm oil products.

"I can keep buying this stuff, and can't practically avoid it, therefore it doesn't affect me."

Most people don't want to dedicate hours a day to a "vote with your feet" attempt that will not even register on corporations' balance sheets.