zlacker

[return to "Google is already pushing WEI into Chromium"]
1. anshum+Qc[view] [source] 2023-07-26 13:12:43
>>topshe+(OP)
As someone who is a somewhat new to web technologies, can someone really explain why this is bad? I saw the techical discussions in the PRs made to the WEI repo but it was all super technical that I was not able to understand the arguments made for and against it.
◧◩
2. mplewi+Ee[view] [source] 2023-07-26 13:20:39
>>anshum+Qc
WEI turns non-compliant browsers into second-class citizens. You’re perfectly free to use whatever compliant browser engine and OS combo you like today – but in a world with WEI, you’ll have to use Approved Chrome on an Approved OS on Approved Hardware with Approved Signing Keys, or you won’t be able to sign into your bank.
◧◩◪
3. netdur+kh[view] [source] 2023-07-26 13:30:54
>>mplewi+Ee
isn't this good? banks can raise security while we can still use any browser to check hackers news! or this 3 cows story?
◧◩◪◨
4. XzAeRo+Bj[view] [source] 2023-07-26 13:40:03
>>netdur+kh
The problem is that this feature can and will be used to restrict the users, it doesn't offer any real benefit to you.

This will not increase security for the user either, it's just a new barrier at the risk of higher fingerprinting. Why should you care how your bank handles security? It's their responsibility, not yours to handle.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. nfw2+Rl[view] [source] 2023-07-26 13:48:33
>>XzAeRo+Bj
Because they have my money?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. mordae+FL[view] [source] 2023-07-26 15:22:43
>>nfw2+Rl
OK, then legislate that this shit can only ever be opt-in and then we can talk.
[go to top]