zlacker

>>jakobd+(OP)
The people involved in this concept/idea/proposal should be shamed into retirement. They should never work in the tech sector again. They should be afraid to use their names before first knowing their audience (an agricultural audience would likely be OK).

>>PaulDa+1L
I don't think calling for targeted harassment is acceptable in *any* case. That's just taking it way too far.

It would be more productive to make it impersonal. E.g., by asking Chrome users to abandon it fast.

>>StrLgh+xI1
You don't think that targetted "harassment" (e.g. publicly calling them dangerous people working against the interests of almost all of us) is called for when they advocate for and actively attempt design a system designed to take away power from us all as individuals?

What would justify targetted harassment, then?

> by asking Chrome users to abandon it fast.

More productive? Or just utterly ineffective?