zlacker

[return to "Mozilla Standards Positions Opposes Web Integrity API"]
1. eganis+s8[view] [source] 2023-07-25 03:35:49
>>danShu+(OP)
Expected, but meaningless if we can't drive people towards Firefox and away from Chromium products. That's something of a responsibility we all have, especially those of us invested in the safety and security (collectively, trust) of the web.

I haven't seen anything yet on whether Brave will support it, though if I'm understanding correctly, they won't have a choice since they're using Chromium. Hopefully I'm misinformed.

◧◩
2. Gigach+b9[view] [source] 2023-07-25 03:44:08
>>eganis+s8
The end result is that DRM and banking sites will just tell you to use chrome to continue. And users will keep migrating to chrome until Mozilla is forced to implement it.
◧◩◪
3. userbi+Yh[view] [source] 2023-07-25 05:05:34
>>Gigach+b9
I would suggest going to the bank, in person, and telling them very strongly that I will take my money elsewhere if they do that.
◧◩◪◨
4. caskst+2F[view] [source] 2023-07-25 08:36:44
>>userbi+Yh
I assume it would go about as well as complaining to Comcast representatives in the famous South Park episode.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. vetina+gW[view] [source] 2023-07-25 11:16:59
>>caskst+2F
You would be surprised.

My bank calls me once every few months, if everything is ok, and if there are is something that is bothering me and could be improved, or if they can help with something. At first I thought it is some marketing program and some manager has to achieve some KPIs, but surprisingly, they did listen to suggestions (it took time, but they eventually did).

So you never know, if you never try.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. caskst+H81[view] [source] 2023-07-25 12:44:56
>>vetina+gW
I had to interact with several bank customer support departments and I'm surprised by experience you described. Are you a $$$-business customer or something?
[go to top]