zlacker

>>danShu+(OP)
Expected, but meaningless if we can't drive people towards Firefox and away from Chromium products. That's something of a responsibility we all have, especially those of us invested in the safety and security (collectively, trust) of the web.

I haven't seen anything yet on whether Brave will support it, though if I'm understanding correctly, they won't have a choice since they're using Chromium. Hopefully I'm misinformed.

>>eganis+s8
The end result is that DRM and banking sites will just tell you to use chrome to continue. And users will keep migrating to chrome until Mozilla is forced to implement it.

>>Gigach+b9
I would suggest going to the bank, in person, and telling them very strongly that I will take my money elsewhere if they do that.

>>userbi+Yh
...and a teller won't/can't do anything about it and this will change nothing. Maybe leave your keyboard for a second and understand how the world actually works.

Unless you have billions at a bank, I don't see why any bank would even consider changing how their website works because of a single customer. And, well, real billionaires probably don't care about not being able to use a website on Firefox.

>>o1y32+rN
Of course, real billionaires probably have staff members doing that work for them.