zlacker

>>danShu+(OP)
Expected, but meaningless if we can't drive people towards Firefox and away from Chromium products. That's something of a responsibility we all have, especially those of us invested in the safety and security (collectively, trust) of the web.

I haven't seen anything yet on whether Brave will support it, though if I'm understanding correctly, they won't have a choice since they're using Chromium. Hopefully I'm misinformed.

>>eganis+s8
The end result is that DRM and banking sites will just tell you to use chrome to continue. And users will keep migrating to chrome until Mozilla is forced to implement it.

>>Gigach+b9
Who uses banking sites on their mobile?

Every financial i use (half a dozen) have an app

>>nly+YF
And why exactly would I use an 'app', if they have a mobile website?

>>simbol+4I
Personally because my bank app also doubles as the authentication token generator that’s paired with Face ID on my phone. So even if I were to use the mobile site I’d need to open the app at some point to authorize any operation. At that point I might just use the app directly and make my life easier.