>>jakobd+(OP)
The people involved in this concept/idea/proposal should be shamed into retirement. They should never work in the tech sector again. They should be afraid to use their names before first knowing their audience (an agricultural audience would likely be OK).
>>PaulDa+1L
It's really perplexing how people in such privilidged positions would put their name on this. Either their not as smart as they appear or somehow manipulated/corrupted.
>>wrapti+JL
I would assume they are prominently putting their names on the proposal to claim they lead this effort during performance review. After all, they are probably expecting a big payout for something like this.