zlacker

>>jakobd+(OP)
Remember they already added DRM to browsers once. There was a big outcry at the time, and they still went ahead and implemented it. Now even Firefox supports Widevine.

If they believe that it's in their best interest, I'm not really sure what we can do against this...

>>zimbat+gi
Who benefits from browsers not supporting EME?

The choices were EME, Flash, or no premium VOD on the web.

>>themer+vK
That's the premise that the RIAA and friends was pushing. There is of course another choice; to stream the movies without DRM. Once Flash was gone, eventually they would have caved in because there is a lot of money to be made by streaming movies.

This was a faustian bargain.

Now that DRM is in the browser, it's going to be pushed further, as with this proposal. It forced Firefox to compromise on their values of open-source in order to stay relevant. Streaming movies are still getting copied the same day.

We know from experience with the gaming and music industry that what protects the publishers is to provide a convenient platform, with reasonable prices. And of course the legal system to take down pirate websites.