zlacker

>>pessim+(OP)
What people are failing to understand with this is that this is target people who are foster and don't have a financial supporter.

I see people talk bad and stuff about how this shouldn't be. However those with parents usually have some sort of financial support.

It does suck it is free-free, because it doesn't teach the foster kid important life lessons, but there is more merit to this.

I still think the kid has to pass the accepting test and I think this is the case. If the kid does well, passed the acceptance test they are clear to learn.

Foster kids are not adopted kids, you can adopt but that makes them your kid. Foster kids have sponsor dads and moms.

>>Sparky+LC
>It does suck it is free-free, because it doesn't teach the foster kid important life lessons, but there is more merit to this.

What about the many countries with free university for everyone? Are those students missing out on important life lessons as well?

>>leafme+9D
Colleges are not Universities and often are for profit. Universities are also for profit in the United States, and I would love it if US had a free tier University for all. That won't happen because of US government.

>>Sparky+RJ
Some US universities are for-profit (as in, can pay out dividends to owners). Most aren't.