zlacker

>>ziggab+(OP)
My understanding of web3 is based on the idea of P2P first, and removing cloud based services as much as possible. Effectively torrent, IPFS, etc. I don't understand why people conflate currency (which HN despises) with that concept, because it's not a necessary aspect. Also, this post doesn't really say anything at all about the tech, or solutions they provided in their company, but simply complains that the marketing folks didn't provide anything. Shouldn't that have been their job as a dev? You can't complain about an idea taking off that you were supposed to develop and simply didn't. If it was a bad idea, then change it and do something else.

Old man yells at cloud.

>>chaxor+u6
P2P does not require blockchain or a new token. Web3 is yet another solution looking for a problem that's better solved in other ways.

>>DebtDe+Vf
This still doesn't make sense. P2P is web3? What does Blockchain have to do with it? Maybe git like Merkle trees can be involved a bit, which are quite similar to blockchains. I'm not understanding the hatred.