zlacker

[return to "Web Environment Integrity Explainer"]
1. akyuu+B8[view] [source] 2023-07-19 13:33:46
>>christ+(OP)
The first use case they mention is restricting ad fraud (and, presumably, ad blocking):

> Users like visiting websites that are expensive to create and maintain, but they often want or need to do it without paying directly. These websites fund themselves with ads, but the advertisers can only afford to pay for humans to see the ads, rather than robots. This creates a need for human users to prove to websites that they're human, sometimes through tasks like challenges or logins.

So if this goes forward, websites will be able to call the web environment integrity API to check you are a proper ad-watching human before serving content.

◧◩
2. bitwiz+wb[view] [source] 2023-07-19 13:45:30
>>akyuu+B8
"Your contract with the network when you get the show is, you're going to watch the spots. Otherwise you couldn't get the show on an ad-supported basis. Anytime you skip a commercial or watch the button you're actually stealing programming."

Jamie Kellner's words still ring true today. When corporations make content available supported by advertisements, they are assuming a moral obligation on your part to see those advertisements. Violating that obligation is felony contempt of business model.

◧◩◪
3. oeitho+Ay[view] [source] 2023-07-19 15:05:34
>>bitwiz+wb
But why should I care about the contract when the providers violates it as well? When you provide your services in the country I reside in but refuse to follow our national laws, you have violated the contract as well.

I live in Norway, and even "serious" advertisers shows me alcohol and gambling advertisiments. This is strictly forbidden by norwegian law, yet I have seen multiple advertisements of this kind from Google, Facebook and Discovery. Discovery in particular has just recently agreed to follow the law for television broadcasts, to be fair.

GDPR is also violated a lot, especially by advertising corporations. I have never consented to the vast amount of tracking that I'm subjected to when browsing the internet, even though I have that right.

It's not like they are obligated to provide services to my country either. If european laws are too strict, they can always leave instead of violating our rights.

[go to top]