zlacker

[return to "Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer"]
1. xd1936+54[view] [source] 2023-07-18 12:28:16
>>akyuu+(OP)
I've used Firefox as my primary browser since the "Quantum" in 2017. Chrome still feels snappier, but Firefox's Container Tabs is hard for me to imagine losing.
◧◩
2. bayind+i8[view] [source] 2023-07-18 12:54:12
>>xd1936+54
Chrome's most of the snappiness is coming from how it handles the DNS queries internally from my experience.

Pair Firefox with a fast DNS, and it's noticably faster than Chrome, for the last 3 years or so.

I discovered it accidentally, after switching to local DNS at the office. We run one of the nation-wide ones in a pretty close proximity in network terms.

◧◩◪
3. EVa5I7+T8[view] [source] 2023-07-18 12:57:23
>>bayind+i8
which is a fast DNS? 1.1.1.1 ? I thought the OS caches DNS anyway, so shouldn't matter much in day to day browsing.
◧◩◪◨
4. bayind+c9[view] [source] 2023-07-18 12:59:37
>>EVa5I7+T8
Anything you can "time nslookup" in or under 0.03 seconds (in "real" terms).

From my desk:

    local one - 0.029 seconds
    1.1.1.1 - 0.035 seconds
    8.8.8.8 - 0.120 seconds
Normally it should be, but Firefox's behavior is very sensitive to DNS response speed. Sounds not intuitive, but I think they're not using glibc's caching, or doing something by themselves.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. aidenn+Ek[view] [source] 2023-07-18 13:48:58
>>bayind+c9
In the past, at least, firefox has done its own caching since expiring my OS dns cache was insufficient to get it to pick up a change in DNS.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. CmdrKr+fA[view] [source] 2023-07-18 14:39:33
>>aidenn+Ek
Good reason to avoid Firefox for development imo. Nothing is more annoying than mysterious cache interventions when you're trying to get a handle on an unrelated problem.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. bayind+AQ[view] [source] 2023-07-18 15:32:51
>>CmdrKr+fA
Dev tools automatically disables caching for that tab, by default.

CTRL+SHIFT+R always disables cache for that reload, too.

[go to top]