zlacker

>>hugodu+(OP)
Tl;dr: We tried to misuse technology and we failed. If Firecracker was developed for a single binary executed fir a short period of time why do you try to use it for multiple executables running for a long time? Does it make any sense to even try?

>>datade+nA1
Where in the "sales" pitch on the fancy-CSS website as well as the README does it say only to use it for single-shot workloads?

I think the complaints are perfectly valid.