zlacker

>>skille+(OP)
I notice they don't actually give a good reason that robots.txt isn't suitable.

Change for the sake of it?

>>dbette+u2
To steelman this maybe, I think they’re angling for something like a mechanism to indicate content is OK to index but not OK to use as AI training data. Maybe you could fudge it today with user agents in robots.txt but who knows what the concrete idea of this is.

>>vore+X2
This seems weird to me though, aren't search engines something very similar to AI, if not outright AI?