zlacker

[return to "Reddit Doubles Down"]
1. extr+k4[view] [source] 2023-06-14 01:04:46
>>stanis+(OP)
I don't really understand why it had to be this way. It's so easy to think of other ways this could have been handled. Even just announcing the same change with 6 months of lead time rather than 1 month would have gone over better. Or boil the frog and gradually introduce API restrictions. It's as if the CEO is purposefully being as belligerent as possible to rile people up.
◧◩
2. Commit+R4[view] [source] 2023-06-14 01:08:18
>>extr+k4
Or they're broke and reddit is soon to be bankrupt.

But even so, if they had just said that, the outcome would be so much different. Because as of now it seems like they're fucking people over for the sake of fucking them over.

◧◩◪
3. judge2+e7[view] [source] 2023-06-14 01:22:28
>>Commit+R4
An influx of capital would be easier by making everyone pay $10/mo to access the API via third-party clients. Would still be unpopular but would mean people could still have the experience they want to see from reddit.

but that's the issue - Reddit's been focusing on other forms of content only in the native Reddit app, like TikTok-esque live streams and promoted posts from subs you aren't subscribed to.

◧◩◪◨
4. a2tech+k8[view] [source] 2023-06-14 01:27:29
>>judge2+e7
They have a $4/month product ALL ready that removes ads and gives you more features. Making that a requirement to use the API is by FAR the simplest and most profitable option. Its also more profit then they're proposing to get from their API charges
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. refulg+ll[view] [source] 2023-06-14 03:14:20
>>a2tech+k8
I don't understand the Apollo side of this --- that's literally what he's being offered, by his own math. $3/month/user. Fairs fair. He has enough users to make millions a year: their servers aren't his for free forever.

People are tying themselves into knots turning Reddit into either near-bankrupt or evil. Or hyper-focusing on particular elements that are just disputable human interactions, like most (i.e. suggesting he could optimize API calls isn't some slap in the face & shitting on his app. really immature!)

I have absolutely 0 dog in this fight, no huge reddit fan, I just don't like how many people I see bamboozled by him. Extremely manipulative behavior.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Prickl+Pp[view] [source] 2023-06-14 03:56:47
>>refulg+ll
This is an incredibly disingenuous take.

First, no it is not 3$. Apple takes a 30% cut, and requires a yearly fee to keep the app on the store. There is also a separate server cost, and a cost associated with paying an engineer. The actual cost is 5 dollars.

Second, there is only one single month to make all changes. Pricing was announced only 30 days prior.

That means payment setup, subscription changes, app update and payment approval requests, etc all need to happen within 30days. This is literally impossible.

Third, there are people who have paid a for a yearly subscription. (10$ total) Those funds either need to be refunded in it's entirety, or be allowed to run out first. Both will not occur within 30 days. That is literally impossible for apollo dev to do. That's just an issue of how refunding works and timelines.

If it is the latter, the dev will be incurring ~50,000 usd in costs every month. This is impossible to sustain.

Either way, there are app store rules that must be followed first. Reddit's timeline is incompatible with them.

And finally, regardless of API costs! reddit has on multiple occasions, defamed Apollo dev. Why would he continue working with a company that makes false blackmail accusations, then doubles down after evidence is provided?

https://old.reddit.com/r/apolloapp/comments/144f6xm/apollo_w...

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. refulg+i81[view] [source] 2023-06-14 10:55:59
>>Prickl+Pp
This is an incredibly disingenuous take. ;)

- $3/user is the Apollo author’s projected costs. Dunno what the rest of that means. “The App Store charges 30%!!!” simply isn’t relevant other than for devs projecting anything that’s hurt them over the last decade into this story

- What are “all the changes”? My understanding is he’d release an update with a new API key with a CC attached.

- If it’s gravely important that the yearly subscriptions who have paid already get free Reddit, why is he shutting down?

- Why is it impossible to give a finite list of customers a refund in 30 days? Again, isn’t he doing it anyway?

- I’ve developed on the App Store since day 30 and don’t know what App Store rule you’re referring to.

- I think your claim is Apple might not let him get an update out? That’s fine. Do what everyone else does and _don’t add the credit card to the old API key_.

- He can’t afford $60K/month? Why not? Charge more than costs. That’s how business works, you don’t have an inalienable right to free APIs.

- he can’t afford $60K/month, redux: he bring in millions a year, right?

- His two claims are:

1. he was offended because Reddit said the app is inefficient - he won’t put it into quotes so I’m guessing it was just generic “you could optimize your api calls” advice

2. He made a very bad joke that he frames as “mostly joking” and frankly, was blackmail. We’re seeing the other side of it now.

Anything else?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. johnny+CZ1[view] [source] 2023-06-14 15:20:19
>>refulg+i81
>Why is it impossible to give a finite list of customers a refund in 30 days? Again, isn’t he doing it anyway?

if that's all you got out of the comment, you clearly aren't trying to see the POV of the app developer. He's under no obligation to keep working for a company that has at this point slandered him behind his back and he can shut down his app whenever he wants.

You are free to judge him but I don't think he's losing sleep over internet comments trying to claim he is disingenuous. Personally, I see no fault on his end, especially when Reddit is dealing the cards to begin with.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. refulg+FV2[view] [source] 2023-06-14 19:02:53
>>johnny+CZ1
Do you understand he doesn't work for Reddit?

Do you understand your comments are focused on making judgements about _personalities_, not business decisions? Do you see how they assume others are too?

Since you've indulged, please, allow me:

Your comments are aggro and focused on personalities and people. I don't find them useful or interesting.

Yes, I know my stance on this isn't the common one. I have been taking it for a few days on several forums.

I've obviously seen a bunch of people who were happy to dismiss everything I said. Your replies stand out as the only ones that were wildly off-topic and myopic. You are strangely focused on social dynamics and stack-ranking strangers that will never meet, and assume the strangers are doing the same.

[go to top]