zlacker

>>jjcm+(OP)
I wasn't able to register initially due to some password strength requirements that aren't written anywhere, and got errors without an explanation of why. Generally I would have bailed at this point but wanted to give your project a look.

Good luck, I think it's a cool idea.

>>newman+xg
Same. Seems to need "special characters" in the password, even though I got a green check mark when putting in a long/strong password with no special chars.

No information in the error feedback, just a red X.

As a side note, I'm tired of websites deciding that a password is not strong enough simply because it does not contain enough random subsclasses of basic ACSII characters.

>>brk+4p
> I'm tired of websites deciding that a password is not strong enough simply because it does not contain enough random subsclasses of basic ACSII characters

me too. and i'd guess at least half of people put 1! at the end to fulfil the requirements anyway.

>>stOnes+z81
Of course, because such requirements are adversarial and make no sense. So they need an adversarial and nonsensical solution :)