zlacker

>>belter+(OP)
[The judge overseeing the case has permitted the plaintiffs to remain anonymous in court filings because of credible threats of violence [PDF] directed at their attorney. The Register understands that the plaintiffs are known to the defendants.]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.40...

>>rolph+Rc
> go f**g cry about github you f**g piece of s*t n**r, I hope your throat gets cut open and every single family member of you is burnt to death

Are github users gamers? Really puts the "git" into "github" there.

>>former+Sf
Considering how large GitHub is (in the industry) it’s like asking is “are Facebook users gamers”?

>>web3-i+3o
That's what struck me about it too. Isn't it the case in a large enough population you can always find representation of something you dislike or hate? I've seen lists of "Republicans" (meaning anyone in, near, or related to a Republican politician) showing those people being caught or convicted of various moral, economic, and social "crimes". Ok. But if I sat down and looked using the same criteria, couldn't I just as easily create a long list for the Democrat party? Having made that statement on Reddit, the response I got was, "well, there are MORE republicans". That struck me as odd too. Are you trying to say of the two horrible things, one is worse, and so I have a moral imperative to chose the less horrible one? I'm fairly sure I get to abandon both in search of a better option. lol

>>notjoe+qK
> I've seen lists of "Republicans" (meaning anyone in, near, or related to a Republican politician) showing those people being caught or convicted of various moral, economic, and social "crimes". Ok.

I’m intrigued. I’d like to see the subset of the list that are people who were in Republican politicians.