zlacker

[return to "Firefox displayed a pop-up ad for Mozilla VPN over an unrelated page"]
1. Crimso+V6[view] [source] 2023-05-25 23:29:03
>>ReadCa+(OP)
From the link:

https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/browser/components/n...

"Messaging System"

"Vision"

"Firefox must be an opinionated user agent that keeps folks safe, informed and effective while browsing the Web. In order to have an opinion, Firefox must have a voice."

"That voice will respect the user’s attention while surfacing contextually relevant and timely information tailored to their individual needs and choices."

Somewhere in all of these companies exists the belligerent ** who orders the subordinates to inject inappropriate profit-seeking changes into the product. And then cajole/order/encourage another subordinate to write a florid virtuous editorial justifying their belligerent idea.

◧◩
2. ReadCa+s7[view] [source] 2023-05-25 23:33:03
>>Crimso+V6
> write a florid virtuous editorial

Related: https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/mozilla-now-only-...

◧◩◪
3. Nikola+Re[view] [source] 2023-05-26 00:30:49
>>ReadCa+s7
Hmm.

On one hand, I largely agree with everything that blog posts says.

BUT!

it presents it as some universal, self-evident truth, and I think it's not. Just because the blog author and I and some others think so, doesn't mean it's the only perspective or that everybody feels that way.

I think there exist people who will enjoy that language, who will understand that language, and to whom that language speaks. My wife, possibly. My sister, almost certainly. Many others in my circle of friends, co-workers, and acquaintances.

And, it's Mozilla. I don't think it's 100% accurate to say "you're a tech company" or that FireFox is "just a browser". Mozilla foundation is non-profit, and it does have goals and vision. It is, I think inherently "political", though not necessarily in the current American sense of "political" which seems to mean "partisan" or "bad". It has a goal and perspective and a point of view. It's trying to do something beyond generate profit for shareholders, so I don't think it's accurate to brand it as "just a tech company" (whether one agrees with its goals, methods and progress is orthogonal).

Ultimately, some people DO choose Firefox as a political statement (that statement perhaps being as simple as "I support independent choice of technology" or "I want my browser to work for me" or even "I don't want Google to COMPLETELY own my life" :). Some people DO see it as a way to vote, or impart a change.

◧◩◪◨
4. teduna+Df[view] [source] 2023-05-26 00:37:24
>>Nikola+Re
Can you ask your wife or sister to translate that language to language that the rest of us will understand? What are they saying?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Nikola+cj[view] [source] 2023-05-26 01:10:08
>>teduna+Df
I mean sure, or I can do a decent job myself ; are you asking to make a point, or a genuine request?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. teduna+Rk[view] [source] 2023-05-26 01:28:50
>>Nikola+cj
I would like to know more about what "Color can change culture. The latest colorways celebrates voices making the world a better place." means.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. shrimp+Pn[view] [source] 2023-05-26 01:57:20
>>teduna+Rk
It's alluding to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_psychology

For example, how https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker-Miller_pink is used in prisons to foster a less violent culture among the prisoners.

"voices making the world a better place" is referring to Martin Luther King, Jr.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. dingle+If2[view] [source] 2023-05-26 16:09:36
>>shrimp+Pn
So they're conducting psy-ops on their users to manipulate them into behaving in a way that Mozilla decided is best? I'm a fan of Firefox, but that's bizarre.
[go to top]