zlacker

[return to "Firefox displayed a pop-up ad for Mozilla VPN over an unrelated page"]
1. Crimso+V6[view] [source] 2023-05-25 23:29:03
>>ReadCa+(OP)
From the link:

https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/browser/components/n...

"Messaging System"

"Vision"

"Firefox must be an opinionated user agent that keeps folks safe, informed and effective while browsing the Web. In order to have an opinion, Firefox must have a voice."

"That voice will respect the user’s attention while surfacing contextually relevant and timely information tailored to their individual needs and choices."

Somewhere in all of these companies exists the belligerent ** who orders the subordinates to inject inappropriate profit-seeking changes into the product. And then cajole/order/encourage another subordinate to write a florid virtuous editorial justifying their belligerent idea.

◧◩
2. ReadCa+s7[view] [source] 2023-05-25 23:33:03
>>Crimso+V6
> write a florid virtuous editorial

Related: https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/mozilla-now-only-...

◧◩◪
3. dingle+z8[view] [source] 2023-05-25 23:41:39
>>ReadCa+s7
Thanks so much for linking that. This is 1000% on point and I'm so confused with what mozilla has been doing the past few years. It's like the organization as a whole suffered a stroke, and the result is this flowery meaningless prose.
◧◩◪◨
4. xg15+eb[view] [source] 2023-05-26 00:00:59
>>dingle+z8
As JRRM wrote, "any man who must say 'I am king' is no true king at all."

Any browser who constantly reminds you how private and user-empowering it is, is probably neither.

Add to that a vaguely liberal-sounding rethoric that could be right out of Ron Desantis' worst "woke lib" stereotypes - without even actually being liberal.

Like, not that I'd see the browser an appropriate location for that, but if they actually wanted to commit to a liberal political view, I'd at least have expected "diverse voices" somewhere. But I have no clue what "independent voices" is supposed to mean.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. revolv+2i[view] [source] 2023-05-26 00:57:10
>>xg15+eb
>JRRM

I know of JRR Tolkien, and GRR Martin, but...

As Charles Dodgson/Lewis Carroll wrote, "If your thoughts incline ever so little towards fuming,” you will say “fuming-furious;” if they turn, by even a hair's breadth, towards “furious,” you will say “furious-fuming;” but if you have the rarest of gifts, a perfectly balanced mind, you will say “frumious.”"

...to add something of more topical substance, I generally agree with the perfectly-balanced opinion above, in that it's a surprisingly mealy-mouthed justification for what is pretty clearly awful behaviour. I'd respect the hustle a lot more if the response hadn't been so verbally Corporate Memphis.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. DiggyJ+bt[view] [source] 2023-05-26 02:48:27
>>revolv+2i
What a beautiful comment. And I agree!

As an aside, I’ve started adding Lewis Carrol, mainly Alice, quotes to the bottom of my weekly status reports and gotten some weirdly positive feedback on this.

[go to top]