zlacker

>>davidb+(OP)
Is there any downside whatsoever for OpenAI/Sam to be the one proposing/leading the calls for regulation? Cynics will say they are trying to pull the ladder up from underneath them, so this is massively beneficial for them. What's the downside (if any)? Getting a small subset of the community mad doesn't seem like a lot of downside.

>>immich+93
Then they’d be engineering their own eventual demise. Any regulatory capture regime ends up stalling progress and bloating incumbents until eventually a nimble competitor is able to circumvent regulators and steal their lunch money.

>>adastr+25
Humans are temporary beings, we only need temporary wealth.

>>namari+oc
If that were true, Sam would never have founded OpenAI. He already had generational wealth.